Website in the process of being upgraded - full menu should be back on all pages soon.
Full menu can be viewed here.


James Richardson BAILEY

James Richardson BAILEY

Male 1899 - 1899  (~ 0 years)    Has 126 ancestors but no descendants in this family tree.


 Set As Default Person    

Personal Information    |    PDF

  • Name James Richardson BAILEY 
    Relationshipwith Teresa Ann GOATHAM
    Born Dec Q 1899  Lancaster Reg Dist, Lancashire, England See the place on a map and other information about it - if available (many more will be in time); also all individuals with events at this location 
    • GRO ref: Bailey, James Richardson, q4 1899 Lanchester RD 10a 321; GRO online index shows mother's maiden name as Richardson
    Gender Male 
    Died Dec Q 1899  Lancaster Reg Dist, Lancashire, England See the place on a map and other information about it - if available (many more will be in time); also all individuals with events at this location 
    • GRO ref: Bailey, James Richardson, aged 0, q4 1899 Lanchester RD 10a 195
    Siblings 6 brothers and 4 sisters 
    Patriarch & Matriarch
    William BAILEY,   b. Abt 1724, (probably in or near), Kingsteignton, Devon, England See the place on a map and other information about it - if available (many more will be in time); also all individuals with events at this location,   d. Jul 1817, Teigngrace, Devon, England See the place on a map and other information about it - if available (many more will be in time); also all individuals with events at this location  (Age ~ 93 years)  (3 x Great Grandfather) 
    Elizabeth Ann Nicholson RICHARDSON,   b. Dec Q 1874, Stanley, Co. Durham, England See the place on a map and other information about it - if available (many more will be in time); also all individuals with events at this location,   d. Jun Q 1933, Thorne Reg Dist, Yorkshire, England See the place on a map and other information about it - if available (many more will be in time); also all individuals with events at this location  (Age ~ 59 years)  (Mother) 
    Person ID I11366  All
    Last Modified 4 Oct 2017 

    Father John BAILEY,   b. 18 May 1872, Rosedale West, Yorkshire, England See the place on a map and other information about it - if available (many more will be in time); also all individuals with events at this location,   d. Mar Q 1945, Durham North Western Reg Dist, Co. Durham, England See the place on a map and other information about it - if available (many more will be in time); also all individuals with events at this location  (Age 72 years) 
    Mother Elizabeth Ann Nicholson RICHARDSON,   b. Dec Q 1874, Stanley, Co. Durham, England See the place on a map and other information about it - if available (many more will be in time); also all individuals with events at this location,   d. Jun Q 1933, Thorne Reg Dist, Yorkshire, England See the place on a map and other information about it - if available (many more will be in time); also all individuals with events at this location  (Age ~ 59 years) 
    Married Mar Q 1895  Lanchester Reg Dist, Co. Durham, England See the place on a map and other information about it - if available (many more will be in time); also all individuals with events at this location 
    • GRO ref: Bailey, John to Richardson, Elizabeth Ann N q1 1895 Lanchester RD 10a 377

      The 1911 census shows that by then John and Elizabeth had at least 9 children, 4 of whom had died. Two others born after 1911 likely to be theirs were Nora (born 1915) and Henry (born 1917) - the latter confirmed by him being with his widowed father at the time of the 1939 register (whilst there were a number of Bailey families having children around this time in Lanchester Reg Dist, it is unlikely there was another where the mother's maiden name was Richardson).
      After these dates, but when Elizabeth was still just young enough to have children, there were Baileys with mother's maiden name Richardson born in Sunderland and Gateshead, but probably different families.

      There were more than 4 other children with a mother's maiden name of Richardson born in Lanchester district between 1895 and 1911 than those shown in the 1911 census as children of John and Elizabeth, but only 4 of these appear to have died before 1911, and hence would seem to be the ones who were the chidlren of John and Elizabeth (the others were Mary 1899 and Elizabeth 1902).
    Family ID F498  Family Group Page  |  Family Chart