Website in the process of being upgraded - full menu should be back on all pages soon.
Full menu can be viewed here.


[ - ? - ]

[ - ? - ]

Male - Yes, date unknown    Has no ancestors but 2 descendants in this family tree.


 Set As Default Person    

Personal Information    |    All    |    PDF

  • Name [ - ? - ] 
    Relationshipwith Teresa Ann GOATHAM
    Gender Male 
    Died Yes, date unknown 
    Person ID I306208  All | All in the Goatham / Gotham One-Name Study
    Last Modified 24 Mar 2023 

    Family Mary FITZSIMMONS,   b. Abt 1833, Stockton-on-Tees, Co. Durham, England See the place on a map and other information about it - if available (many more will be in time); also all individuals with events at this location,   d. Mar Q 1912, Stockton Reg Dist, Co. Durham or Yorkshire, England See the place on a map and other information about it - if available (many more will be in time); also all individuals with events at this location  (Age ~ 79 years) 
    Other Partners: Anthony GOTHAN  m. 12 Jul 1853;   Thomas HEPTON  m. Dec Q 1866 
    Married Between 1860 and 1863 
    • Mary had two illegitimate daughters, one must have been conceived in 1860, the other in 1862.  I am assuming that the first, Mary Jane, was illegitimate despite not knowing when Mary's husband, Anthony, died, as like her sister no father was named on her birth registration. (No mother's maiden name either, this was often omitted on the birth certificates for children of widows, despite the child and their mother's surname being different from their mother's maiden name).
      The two daughters although shown here under one 'unknown' father may have had different fathers. She was not living with anyone at the time of the 1861 census, when she must have been pregnant.
      Mary is shown in the 1911 census as having had 5 children, not 6, but both birth registrations name the mother as Mary, and I think it is the same one although it is just possible another Mary briefly had her surname recorded as Gothan.
      That said, the no. of children given in 1911 should refer to those born to Mary's current marriage. There appears only to have been 2, so I am guessing she (or the workhouse in which she was living) mistakenly gave the total no. of children; this field was probably misunderstood and so contains the wrong info. more than any other. It could be, though, that Mary did have 3 others born to her second marriage, but who died soon after birth and whose births weren't registered, or she may have even counted stillbirths or mis-carriages.
    Married? Not married or evidence to suggest they didn't marry 
    Children 2 children 
    Last Modified 24 Mar 2023 
    Family ID F301886  Family Group Page  |  Family Chart