Website in the process of being upgraded - full menu should be back on all pages soon.
Full menu can be viewed here.


Mary LAKEMAN

Mary LAKEMAN

Female 1776 - Yes, date unknown    Has 10 ancestors but no descendants in this family tree.


 Set As Default Person    

Personal Information    |    Sources    |    Event Map    |    All    |    PDF

  • Name Mary LAKEMAN 
    Relationshipwith Teresa Ann GOATHAM
    Baptised 1 Jan 1776  St. Mary’s Church, Charleton, Devon, England See the place on a map and other information about it - if available (many more will be in time); also all individuals with events at this location  [1
    Gender Female 
    Died Yes, date unknown 
    Siblings 1 sister 
    Patriarch & Matriarch
    John LAKEMAN,   d. Yes, date unknown  (Father) 
    Mary TAPLEY,   b. Est 1720,   d. Yes, date unknown  (Grandmother) 
    Person ID I17872  All
    Last Modified 12 Mar 2015 

    Father John LAKEMAN,   d. Yes, date unknown 
    Mother Mary PEPPERELL,   bap. 25 Apr 1756, St. James’ Church, Slapton, Devon, England See the place on a map and other information about it - if available (many more will be in time); also all individuals with events at this location,   d. Yes, date unknown 
    Married 17 Jan 1775  St. Mary’s Church, Charleton, Devon, England See the place on a map and other information about it - if available (many more will be in time); also all individuals with events at this location 
    • 'John Lakeman of th and Mary Pepperell Sojourner in this Parish', by Banns, witnesses Robert Pepperell and Nicholas Straw (all 4 signed, I believe Nicholas Straw was Parish Clerk at this time)

      ** I may not have this marriage attached to the right Mary Pepperell. **
      This Mary seems likely as she had a father Robert who may have been the witness, especially as she was under 21. She also had a brother Robin, sometimes recorded as Robert, but I think was proabably a mistake and he would have not signed his own name as Robert (and the handwriting does not look the same as his signature when he married).

      An alternative Mary to be the one who married John Lakeman was the one baptised in Charleton in 1750. If from Charleton could she have been shown as sojourner? I think so, if the family moved to another Parish, or if Mary had, as often happened when a girl became a servant prior to marriage; she may then have returned shortly before the marriage. The fact that her maiden name was first written in the register before being corrected when their first child was baptised does suggest the priest may have thought of her as Mary Pepperell, i.e. have known her because she had lived for sometime in Charleton. On the other hand, there is no obvious Robert who might have been the witness - no brother, father, 1st cousin or uncle or this name.  

      Who was the Robert who witnessed the wedding? If Mary was an only child can't have been a brother, and not the father of this Mary. Simon seems still to have been alive so I don't think the marriage was of his widow.

      Were there children? - date span over which born might give a clue to her age.
    Family ID F6669  Family Group Page  |  Family Chart

  • Event Map Click to hide
     = Link to Google Earth (if installed; see link below to install) 
    Pin Legend Address Church or Cemetery Military service or death Hospital Small location Town / City County, state or province Country Registration District Place of education Court Property Not Set

  • Sources 
    1. [S296] Charleton - Parish Registers (FMP data), St Mary’s Church (Charleton, Devon), (brightsolid online publishing ltd. findmypast.com.), Baptism of Mary LAKEMAN; accessed 12 Mar 2015 (Reliability: 3), 12 Mar 2015.

      "Mary Daughter of John & Mary Pepperrell Lakeman was Baptized [Janu]ary the 1st." - immediately under heading '1776'

      'Lakeman' inserted above and partly beside struckthrough 'Pepperrell' in the same hand; the gap between 'Pepperell' and 'was' suggests the change was made at the time the event was being entered into the register.
      Part of page missing, hence assumed letters in []
      DHC Archive reference: 3034A/PR/1/2